|
Scale and global reach is likely to be an important criteria in winning and managing major programs.
Relationships and networks in country with donor representatives, recipient governments, local organisations and development
professionals are becoming increasingly important.
Opportunity/Approach/Success Factors
Opportunities for involvement exist across a whole spectrum of activities, from short-term review/assessment activities in Australia, to
short-term offshore assignments for individuals or teams, to long-term offshore assignments for individuals or teams, to overall project
management which might include technical inputs as well as sub-contracting of activities.
Organisations such as The Development Executive Group (http://www.developmentex.com) are a valuable resource for individuals and firms to
identify opportunities, individuals and potential partners.
This Group provides a range of free information and support services to individuals and companies, including project information
updates, a weekly development newsletter and employment opportunities in the development sector.
An immediate key success factor is the consideration of which level of involvement for a particular opportunity is likely to deliver the best
result with the minimum of risk for the organisation, the client, the stakeholders and the recipients of support.
Many of the larger activities, such as programs, facilities and sector-wide approaches, often have sub-components that will be let out meaning
the overall project managing firm could be ineligible to perform the services within a sub-component.
The key principles to securing sub-component involvement is often identical to that required to
secure the overall project, as there will be a call for tender using the same or very similar process to that used by the funding agency.
Consequently, all levels of involvement in the development arena are likely at some point to require interested organisations/individuals to
participate in a competitive tendering round. This is often the case regardless of the size of the resultant budget.
Reality Check - Tendering efficiency and effectiveness remains critical.
Tendering skills alone, while critical, are not the sole success factor in fact tendering well in the absence of other key activities/initiatives
may prove insufficient. Key considerations for success, in addition to compiling a winning tender include:
- Having the winning product the team, the approach, the methodology, and the response to the requirements of a tender
- Ensuring advance positioning research, preparation, resources
- Maintaining adequate promotion often the key here is relationships, and certainly past achievements
- Being in the right place knowing the clients and stakeholders and having an international presence
- Offering the right price must be competitive and offering value for money.
The tender response is often the most challenging aspect (apart from implementation of course), addressed by ensuring appropriate preparation and
analysis is conducted in advance.
The tendering timeframe usually falls within a 4 8 week period and generally responses would be required to address key criteria
including the team, approach and methodology, management, and price.
Reality Check - Preparation must commence prior to the public call for tender if a realistic chance of success is to be expected.
These thoughts are by no means exhaustive, though they do cover some core principles relevant to successful business development and tendering
approaches.

Mel Dunn is Managing Director of Global Business and Development Solutions (globizdev.com
), which works with individuals and organisations that are committed to business success and the success of others.
|